Lawyers for Roberts-Smith reject ‘completely baseless’ allegations against four witnesses set to give evidence for the SAS veteran
* Get our free news app; get our morning email briefing
* Follow our Australia news live blog for the latest updates
Four SAS witnesses to be called by Ben Roberts-Smith in his war crimes defamation trial have been accused of colluding in their evidence concerning a murder allegation against the SAS veteran before the federal court.
In an argument over access to documents and whether they attract legal privilege, lawyers for the three newspapers being sued by Roberts-Smith have alleged the four soldiers have all given the “same, precise, demonstrably false error” in their outlines over an Afghan special forces member. Roberts-Smith’s lawyers said the newspapers’ allegation of collusion was scandalous, describing the arguments before court as “completely baseless” and “an attempt to prejudice the court and the public” against the witnesses.
Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/SNBpJN
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In the Land of the Very Old
Jan 23, 2024 — by Sam Toperoff in Original for THE SUNDAY LONG READ 1. Passports, or Prescriptions I am writing this in a blue notebook I ...
-
At the New York Times trial, the former governor was impressive at first. It didn’t last. BY SETH STEVENSON | Slate FEB 10, 20228:31 PM S...
-
Every day in America, kids get their hands on lethal weapons, with disastrous consequences Tyler Paxton on vacation with his parents in the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment