Lawyers for Roberts-Smith reject ‘completely baseless’ allegations against four witnesses set to give evidence for the SAS veteran
* Get our free news app; get our morning email briefing
* Follow our Australia news live blog for the latest updates
Four SAS witnesses to be called by Ben Roberts-Smith in his war crimes defamation trial have been accused of colluding in their evidence concerning a murder allegation against the SAS veteran before the federal court.
In an argument over access to documents and whether they attract legal privilege, lawyers for the three newspapers being sued by Roberts-Smith have alleged the four soldiers have all given the “same, precise, demonstrably false error” in their outlines over an Afghan special forces member. Roberts-Smith’s lawyers said the newspapers’ allegation of collusion was scandalous, describing the arguments before court as “completely baseless” and “an attempt to prejudice the court and the public” against the witnesses.
Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/SNBpJN
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
WHAT IS BREAKOUT → RE-TEST?
Breakout: When the price breaks a support or resistance level that it has tested before and moves above or below that level. Re-...
-
By Hallie Knight , Published in Poem-a-Day on January 23, 2021, by the Academy of American Poets. The house was built, Brick by brick, p...
-
In a new book, translated by Molly Ringwald, Maria’s cousin recalls the fame and turbulence that followed the release of Bernardo Bertolucci...

No comments:
Post a Comment