Wednesday, 13 October 2021

WHAT TO CONSIDER BEFORE BUYING MTN SHARES



October 13, 2021, The Money Engineer, Investment, Leave a comment.

https://themoneyengineers.com/2021/10/13/what-to-consider-before-buying-mtn-shares/

1. Introduction

MTN Uganda is selling 20 percent of its shares to the public. In this very long article I try to summarize the key disclosures in the prospectus with the aim of simplifying it and providing useful information to the reader to make an informed decision.

I have written an introductory article on investing in the stock market. The reader not familiar with shares should start there: 
{ https://themoneyengineers.com/2021/06/26/investing-in-the-stock-market/}

I have assumed that the reader is an ordinary person of sound mind with no background in finance.

A prospective investor should seek to answer the following questions before buying any shares:
1. What are the details of the offer?
2. Do I know the company I am investing in?
3. What are the future prospects?
4. What products and services does the company offer?
5. Does the company have a social license to operate?
6. Is the company well managed?
7. How is the telecom market performing?
8. How is the policy and regulatory landscape?
9. What is the company’s dividend policy?
10. How has the company performed in the past? 
11. Is the offer price fair? 
12. What are the key risks? 
13. Do I have the funds to invest?
14. Does this investment meet my investment objectives? 

I will attempt to provide answers to these questions in the sections below:

The reader should familiarize themselves with the detailed prospectus which can be found here: { https://www.mtn.co.ug/investor/prospectus/}

The information shared in this article is based on the company’s issued prospectus and other publicly available information and does not amount to financial advice. (The full disclaimer can be found in section 17 of this document)
 
2. What are the details of the offer?

Background and Objectives of the Offer
MTN is selling 20 percent of its shares to the public to allow Ugandan investors, including MTN’s loyal customers, to own a stake in the Company and participate in its future growth. 

In addition, the Offer and the Listing are being undertaken to comply with the provisions of the NTO (national telecommunications operator) Licence which requires MTN to sell a portion of its shares to the public. 

This is a good move by the government to promote local ownership of these profitable foreign companies. Ugandans should take advantage of this opportunity and consider investing.

Particulars of the Offer

A total of 4,477,808,848 shares are being sold at a price of UGX 200 per share which represents 20% of the issued share capital of the Company.

The opening date is 11th October 2021 and the closing date of the offer is
22nd November 2021. Anyone interested in buying shares has to do so within this period. The shares will be listed on the Uganda Securities Exchange on 6th  December 2021.

Minimum number of Offer Shares per  Application
You can buy a minimum of 500 shares to participate in the IPO. Each share is being sold ugx 200. That means that the minimum investment is ugx 100,000. Applications for more shares must be in multiples of 500. There is no limit to how many shares you can buy.

Ugandan Retail Investors Priority and  Oversubscription
Ugandan retail investors will be given first priority in allocation of shares. If too many people apply to buy shares the priority will be given to Ugandan retail investors especially those who have bought above ugx 5 million shillings.

Incentive shares
There is an incentive scheme to encourage Ugandans to participate. 5 Incentive Shares for every 100 Sale Shares shall be allocated to Uganda Retail Investors and East African Retail Investors. In addition eligible MTN Customers applying through the m-IPO Platform and  paying through MTN Mobile Money will be given 5 Incentive Shares for every 100 Sale Shares allocated (in addition to the general Uganda Retail Investors incentive). This is actually a good opportunity for Ugandans to take ownership in a solid company at discounted prices.

How to apply for shares
The easiest way to buy the shares is to talk to your stock broker or access the USE Easy-Portal at https://scd.use.or.ug/ or dial *165*65#, or use the MyMTN App for MTN customers.

3. Do I know the company I am investing in?

The following key statistics can help to put the offer in perspective
• MTN is the number 1 player in the telecoms market
• MTN has 14.2 million subscribers
• MTN has 4.6m active data subscribers
• 8.5 million momo subscribers
• MTN Uganda operates in 134 districts (there are very private companies with such coverage in the country)
• 120,000 momo agents (this is a massive operation which ensures that mobile money is available throughout the country)
• 200 service stores
• 14 main distributors

Background and Nature of Business

MTN was incorporated as a private company limited by shares on 25 February 1998. At the time when mobile cellular service penetration in Uganda was at a low of 0.27%. Since then there has been tremendous growth of the telecommunications sector in Uganda with current penetration at 70% (seven lines for every ten individuals) as of 30 June 2020.

MTN is a leading mobile operator in Uganda. According to the UCC Market Report Q2 2021, the number of telephone subscriptions in Uganda stood at 28,986,019 as of 30 June 2021. The Company’s reporting data as of 31 December 2020 indicates that of these industry-wide subscriptions, 14.2 million are MTN customers, 4.6 million of which are 30-day active data subscribers. In the mobile money market, MTN has approximately 8.5 million active 30-day MTN Mobile Money subscribers.

In 2009, MTN pioneered mobile money business in Uganda and conducted that business alongside its telecommunications business until 2021 when, as a consequence of the enactment of the National Payment System Act (NPS) Act, MTN was required to transfer the mobile money business to a wholly owned subsidiary. Following the completion of the licensing and structuring process prescribed by the NPS Act, the mobile money business was transferred to and is currently conducted by the Mobile Money Company with effect from 19 June 2021. The mobile money business continues to be a significant contributor to MTN’s earnings.

MTN has a presence in all 134 districts of Uganda and has evolved from a telecommunications company providing value added services to a provider of an innovative range of products and services including voice, data, digital and mobile financial services delivered through a network of  approximately 120,000 mobile money agents, 200 service stores and 14 main distributors.

MTN is a subsidiary of MTN Group. MTN Group is a leading emerging market mobile operator, with customers in 20 markets in Africa and the Middle East. As of 31 December 2020, MTN Group had over 273 million subscribers across its operating subsidiaries and joint ventures. MTN Group is one of the largest companies listed on the JSE in Johannesburg, South Africa with a market capitalization of ZAR113 billion (USD 7.8 billion) at the end of 2020.

4. What are the future prospects?

MTN’s strategy is centred around becoming a fully-fledged digital platform as a business. In the medium-term, MTN will work towards the implementation of its Ambition 2025 strategy, including strategically repositioning its financial technology and infrastructure assets and platforms (such as the recent separation of the Company’s financial technology platform into a new wholly owned subsidiary) from its core telecommunications business.

As illustrated Above, the execution of Ambition 2025 is embodied in four clear strategic priorities – building the largest and most valuable platforms, driving industry-leading connectivity operations, creating shared value and to accelerating portfolio transformation. 

The strategic priorities will be underpinned by five vital enablers to assist in operationalizing the Ambition 2025 strategy – 
• MTN Mobile Money and accompanying  financial technology solutions, 
• Ayoba with MTN (digital services), 
• enterprise services, 
• network as a service and 
• Chenosis (a marketplace for application programming interface).

5. What products and services does the company offer?

MTN Uganda offers the following products and services
• Voice (Voice contributes 50.9% of revenues)
• Data (Data is growing and contributes 18% of revenues. There is potential for this to grow especially with work and study from home reality because of COVID)
• Mobile money (mobile money contributes 26.4% of revenues)
• Digital services
• Enterprise services

Uganda has a very young population which is growing very fast. It is predicted that Uganda will have a total population of 45.5 million people by 2023 and 51.1 million people by 2027.
This young dynamic generation will drive demand for voice, data and digital services in the future. For instance my six year old daughter has access to a tablet and a laptop and attends online school from home through the internet.

6. Does the company have a social license to operate?

In July 2007, MTN established the MTN Foundation as an incorporated trust for the purpose of focusing the Company’s corporate social investment initiatives that are aimed at contributing to the reduction of poverty and fostering sustainable development in Uganda. The main objective of the MTN Foundation is to improve the quality of life in communities across the country by supporting and implementing sustainable projects in four thematic areas: Youth Empowerment, Education, Health and Other National Priorities. The MTN Foundation is governed by a Board of Trustees made up of eminent members of society and senior MTN officers.

The MTN Foundation is funded annually by an endowment from MTN of 1% of MTN’s profit after tax and partners with credible public and private non-profit organizations to execute sustainable projects in each of the chosen focus areas.

MTN Uganda is part and parcel of the fabric of Ugandan society. Almost every trading center has some MTN booth. The local operator knows everyone in town. The almost constant marketing campaigns have become part of the daily conversation. MTN has sponsored many social events including the MTN marathon and several music shows. Plus it provides direct and indirect employment to thousands. It also contributes a lot to the country’s tax revenues. A phone number has now become part of a Ugandan’s identity.

MTN brought the dream of owning a phone to the common man at a time when phones were inaccessible. Of course there is the occasional glitch and rude customer agent, but, overall MTN has positively impacted the nation and in my opinion has a social license to operate.
 
7. Is the company well managed?

Ownership
The majority shareholder is MTN International which owns 96.014%. The ultimate owner is the MTN group. MTN international is the one that is selling the 20%. It appears a number of holding companies were set up in the process for tax advantages. There is a minority shareholder, Charles Mbire, who owns 3.986%. The prospectus discloses Mr. Charles Mbire’s business interests in Invesco and Nilecom which are both associated to some extent with MTN.

Management
The board is led by Mr. Charles Mbire who is a leading businessman, entrepreneur and industrialist in Uganda and has been the chairperson of 
the Board since 2003. Mr. Charles Mbire, owns 892,230,775 Shares representing 3.986% interest in the issued share capital of MTN).

In addition to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Finance Officer, who are members of the Board, MTN is led by an experienced management team with a mix of local and international expertise. 

Mr. Vanhelleputte is  the Chief Executive Officer for MTN. Mr. Wim Vanhelleputte is a seasoned executive with over 20 years’ experience in the telecommunications sector across eight countries in Africa. 

In my opinion, from the face of it, MTN seems to have a competent leadership team. This is further demonstrated by their leadership of the telecom market. 

Employee Headcount

MTN has a diverse workforce of 1,020 personnel. 520 are permanent employees while 500 are contract / outsourced staff. This makes MTN one of the largest employers in the country.

8. How is the telecom market performing?
Telecommunications

Uganda’s telecommunications sector is one of the continent’s fastest growing markets by subscribers and operator activity. According to the UCC Market 
Report Q2 2021, the Ugandan telecommunications market had a total of 28,986,019 subscribers as of 30 June 2021, with 616,785  new mobile subscribers being added for the quarter.  

The National Budget Speech 2021-2022 reports that with regard to GOU’s digitisation agenda, internet access as of June 2021 stood at 52%, with 21 million people using the internet. Active mobile money subscriptions stood at 23 million served by 235,800 mobile money agents. High-speed optical fibre cable covers 3,900 kilometres. In addition, new industries have been established in the assembly of computers, mobile phones and accessories, and the development of knowledge-based information and communications technology solutions. 

The National ICT Initiatives Support Programme established by the Ministry of ICT in 2017 has funded the local development of 115 applications, many of which are in use in the public and private sector. 

According to Fitch Solutions’ Uganda Telecommunications Report Q1 2021, the Ugandan market is expected to grow at an average rate of 4.2% over the forecast period 2020-2029. Uganda’s telecommunications market penetration rate presents enormous organic growth opportunities for the operators in the market. The operators have also been credited with the growth in network connected devices. According to the UCC, this is as a result of mobile network operator-device importer partnerships.

Mobile Money

MTN Uganda conducts its mobile money business through a wholly owned subsidiary called  MTN Mobile Money (U) Limited.

The UCC Market Report Q4 2020 reports that the number of mobile money transactions during Q4 2020 crossed the 1 billion transactions mark, the first-time that this milestone has been recorded and surpassing the previous quarterly record of 954 million transactions posted in Q3 2020. These transactions included agent assisted deposits, mobile money-bank transfers, mobile betting and merchant payments, among other transaction categories. 

The UCC Market Report Q2 2021 indicates that as of 30 June 2021, the number of registered mobile money accounts stood at 31.3 million, with a national penetration of three mobile money accounts for every four Ugandans. However, the UCC noted in its UCC Market Report Q1 2021 that following a sector- wide clean-up of mobile money account registers, the number of active mobile money accounts in Uganda as of 31 March 2021 stood at 20,298,694. Accordingly, the number of registered mobile money accounts must always be measured as against active users. According to the UCC, Uganda generally holds a mobile money activity ratio of 66%, which is double the aggregate African average of 30% account activity.

As Fitch Solutions’ Uganda Telecommunications Report Q1 2021 confirms, MTN has solidified customer relationships by offering a wider range of mobile financial services, creating new revenue streams and improving customer loyalty in a market where it has seen subscriptions numbers come under pressure. 

MTN continues to remain better placed than traditional banks to tap into Uganda’s underserved loans and savings market and in 2016, MTN was the first operator to offer loan and savings services in Uganda through MoKash. With its platform already in place, MTN can offer small loans cost-effectively, allowing customers to gradually build up a credit rating and gain greater confidence to participate in credit-based transactions.

9. How is the policy and regulatory landscape?

MTN Uganda operates under Uganda’s legal environment. It has a license from Uganda Communications Commission to operate a telecommunications business. The mobile money business is regulated by Bank of Uganda.

The government of Uganda is aiming for universal access to ICT for all Ugandans. The National Development Programme (NDP) III digital transformation programme aims to increase ICT penetration and use of ICT services for social and economic development. 

The key expected results include:
• increasing ICT penetration;
• reducing cost of ICT devices and services;
• creating more direct jobs in the sector; and 
• increasing ICT incubation; and increasing government services online.

Overview of NTO (National Telecommunications Operator) Licence

MTN holds an NTO license which is for a period of 12 years with effect from 1 July 2020.  The NTO Licence will expire on 30 June 2032 and may be renewed at the UCC’s discretion. There is a risk here because the licence may not be renewed or maybe cancelled depending on government’s policy.

MTN paid an upfront licence fee of USD 100 million for the NTO Licence. The Company is also required to pay a levy of 2% of its gross annual revenues for the licence term as the Company’s contribution towards information and communication technology and rural communication development. The licensing costs are significant and seem to exert some pressure on the company.

10. What is the company’s dividend policy?

MTN’s current dividend policy provides that MTN will target a dividend pay-out ratio of at least 60% of annual profits after tax. The average payout ratio in the last 4 years was 57%.

11. How has the company performed in the past?
Profitability

The company is clearly profitable and reported after tax profits of ugx 322bn in 2020. This represent a net profit margin of about 17%. Sales have grown by about 9% in the last 5 years. The profits after tax have grown by about 35%. This is a good performance compared to how the economy is performing. Uganda’s GDP will grow at 3.3% for the financial year 2021-2022, which, while an increment from the 3% growth rate recorded for the financial year 2020-2021 is lower than the desired target of 6.8%.

Liquidity

The company has positive cash balances of ugx 137bn as at 30th June 2021 which is a good thing. This means it can meet its immediate obligations. The company has also generated net positive cashflows in the last five years except in 2020 where it seems to have over invested.

Financial Risk

The company has some debt on its books amounting to about 388bn as at 31st December 2020. The debt portfolio represents  14% of the total assets of the company which is relatively small compared to other highly leveraged businesses. 

The finance costs were ugx 156bn in 2020 which represents 26% of the operating profits. This implies that the company is able to meet its loan obligations at least in the foreseeable future.

Shareholder return

The average dividend payout ratio in the last 4 years has been 57.23%. The stated dividend policy in the prospectus is 60%. At this level of payout the imputed dividend for 2020 would have been ugx 8.6 per share (for issued capital after IPO). This represents a dividend yield of 4%. To earn at least a benchmark return of 10% which is the typical treasury bill return the share price would need to increase by at least 6% to ugx 212. It’s difficult to predict how the share price will perform after IPO so the shareholder return can’t easily be projected.

The prospective investor will have to make a judgement call on the future prospects of the company and how the company might remain attractive to investors.

12. Is the offer price fair?

The shares are being offered at a share price of ugx 200 per share. We can evaluate if this price is fair by comparing it with the company’s estimated value per share. From the prospectus the company’s net equity as at December 2020 was ugx 726 billion. The total issued shares after IPO will be 22,389,044,239.  This means that the value per share is about ugx 32.4. This means that the offer price is about 6 times the book value of the company.

The profit after tax in 2020 was ugx 322 billion. This means that the earnings per share is about ugx 14.38. The price earnings (p/e) ratio is about 13.9. The price earnings ratio of Safaricom is about 24.03. This means that although the MTN offer seems highly priced it’s still undervalued compared to its peer (Safaricom). The p/e ratio gives us an indication of how investors view the future prospects of a company. For example the p/e ratio of Apple is about 27.96.

Further dilution is expected when the 5,610,955,761 unissued shares are allotted. Overall the price seems relatively high but given the company’s future prospects it might be undervalued. I didn’t find sufficient information in the prospectus to value the company based on future cashflows.

The prospective investor needs to make a judgement call on whether the price is fair or not taking into account several factors. It’s just like buying land. It’s all about willing buyer, willing seller. Some people may view a piece of land as too expensive. Others will swoop in considering it a bargain offer. It’s all about perspective.

13. What are the key risks?

A number of risk factors are mentioned in the prospectus including but not limited to the following:
• The dividend payout is not guaranteed;
• Cyber security attacks;
• Mobile money fraud;
• The licenses may not be renewed;
• The company may be sued by different people;
• Changing technology may render the business unsustainable;
• Loss of key personnel;
• The share price may drop;
• The IPO may not attract enough people;
• Market competition from other players;
• Changes in regulatory and policy framework;

The prospective investor should carefully weigh these risks against their investment objectives before buying any shares.

14. Do I have the funds to invest?

The minimum investment requirement is ugx 100,000 though this is unlikely to make you rich! There is no upper limit. There is an incentive for retail investors if they invest at least ugx 5m. In case of oversubscription Ugandans who have invested at least ugx 5m will be given first priority plus all the incentive shares.

So a good target if you wish to invest is about ugx 5m. Of course any amount above ugx 100k is acceptable.

The funds you use should be risk capital. This means don’t put your children’s school fees in the IPO. You should be willing to lose all this money and to hang in there for at least 5 years plus.

I wouldn’t borrow to buy shares because the returns are not guaranteed yet the interest repayment is certain.

15. Does this investment meet my investment objectives?
Investing in shares should form a portion of your overall investment portfolio. You should aim to own a basket of shares in different companies not just MTN. This basket may include a bank, a beer company, a utility, etc. Owning a single stock is quite risky and is not well advised. 

Stocks give you some growth opportunity although they come with some risk. The prospective investor should carefully evaluate their overall investment objectives and make sure any purchase decisions align appropriately. For instance if you want a steady return then you should  not buy shares. You would rather put the money in a unit trust or treasury bill/bond and earn a steady interest income.

16. Conclusion

MTN is the number 1 player in the telecoms market with over 14 million subscribers. The company is profitable with revenue projected to grow at 10%. The company is part of the MTN group which has over 273 million subscribers across 20 markets in Africa and the Middle East. The parent company is listed in South Africa with a market capitalization of over $7.8 billion.

The company operates in a growing economy with a relatively young demographic which will continue to demand voice, data, mobile money and other digital services.

The offer price of ugx 200 seems a little bit high compared with the company’s book value. However an accurate valuation should be based on future prospects which are difficult to quantify. The price is however affordable as the minimum investment is ugx 100,000. An incentive has been put in place to encourage Ugandans to participate (5 incentive shares for every 100 shared allotted). So a good target for retail investors is a minimum of ugx 5m because you’ll be prioritized in case of oversubscription.

The imputed dividend yield of 4% seems low compared to other safer bets like a simple treasury bill. The prospective investor will need to earn at least 6% in capital gains to achieve a benchmark return of 10%. 

The prospective investor has to make a bet on the company’s future prospects because this is what will really drive her returns in terms of capital gains.

Overall this offer is a possibly good opportunity for all Ugandans and East Africans to own a small portion of a large profitable company and I would encourage everyone to seriously consider it.

17. Disclaimer 

The information shared in this article is based on the company’s issued prospectus and other publicly available information and does not amount to financial advice. These are my personal opinions and should not be relied on to make an investment decision. Investing in shares in risky and the share price might fluctuate. Anyone relying on this information to make a purchase decision does so at their own risk. The services of a professional financial advisor should be sought before buying shares in any company.

18. About the Author

The Money Engineer (aka John Ntende) is a finance professional with an engineering background. He has over 13 years practical experience in business strategy, finance, management, entrepreneurship and investment. He currently leads the corporate strategy team at the Electricity Regulatory Authority. John is passionate about helping people realize their true potential through personal development and financial literacy. John is also an avid entrepreneur and has invested in a cottage manufacturing facility which makes food condiments and fruit juices.

He publishes a daily online blog to teach and inspire other people to take charge of their money. In his free time, he grows fish in his backyard.

John is a published author having written two books on backyard fish farming and financial literacy. John is married with two daughters and currently lives and works in Uganda.

You can follow The Money Engineer online at https://themoneyengineers.com/

‘It is devastating’: the millennials who would love to have kids – but can’t afford a family


‘I can’t even afford a dog, so how would I afford a child?’

They are working three jobs, changing careers or moving to faraway areas with affordable housing in order to drum up enough money for children of their own. Sadly the numbers still don’t add up

By  for THE GUARDIAN

Wed 13 Oct 2021 06.00 BST
“People need to stop telling me to ‘just get on with it’ if I want to have children,” Jen Cleary says, clearly exasperated. “Most of my generation simply cannot afford to. Being childless is out of my hands and it is a devastating and frustrating reality.” Cleary, a 35-year-old former teacher, is recounting how financial precariousness means that her dream of having a family may never come true. It is an experience that many millennials – defined roughly as those born between 1981 and 1996 – have encountered.

One in five women are childless by midlife [including involuntarily and by choice] and 80% of those are due to circumstance, not infertility,” says Jody Day, the founder of Gateway Women, a support network for involuntarily childless women. “So much of this 80% is due to a tapestry of systemic issues, like student debts and career focus, meaning that family planning is left too late,” she adds, while rising house prices and a lack of affordable childcare make genuine financial security seem harder and harder to attain.

These are all contributing factors to Cleary’s story. Having met her wife while they were both training to become teachers nine years ago, the pair started saving for a deposit on a flat while they were renting in London. “We were hopeful that we’d get a good salary, find somewhere nice to live and have children, either through adoption or a sperm donor,” Cleary says. They bought a flat but, only a few months after moving in, the Grenfell fire occurred and triggered a nationwide reassessment of building practices. Their flat was found to have flammable cladding and their service charges ballooned, while the value of the flat began to fall.

“We couldn’t afford the flat and its service charges on teachers’ salaries,” Cleary says. “We eventually sold this year to a cash buyer, but lost £20,000 in the process, and we have really struggled to find somewhere new. We have rented four different flats in six months and keep failing our credit score when it comes to finding a new mortgage because we’ve run up so much debt.”

All the while, the process of beginning adoption proceedings or finding a sperm donor slipped further away. “Adoption applications want you to have lived somewhere for a while, so that you have roots for your child, and we of course can’t give them that right now,” Cleary says. “Sperm donation costs around £2,000 per go, so unless you have a friend you can co-parent with, it’s very expensive to be a gay woman and have a baby. It is also very difficult to adopt if you’ve gone through a tried-and-failed pregnancy cycle initially, so we would need to give a fair amount of time in between if we went for sperm donation first. There are a lot of barriers and decisions to be made. Meanwhile, I’m 35 and my biological clock is ticking.”

Ultimately, Cleary and her wife decided to prioritise finding a suitable home before coming back to the question of children. Cleary has left her job as a teacher for a higher-paid corporate role, and they are looking to move to an area where the housing market is less inflated. Such a momentous decision has an emotional impact. “We have friends who have children and who aren’t sensitive to our situation. I might miss their kid’s birthday party because I find it difficult, but they get upset with me and don’t understand why. Part of me wishes I’d never become a teacher in the first place, because then we might have had enough money to make it happen.”

While childlessness is on the rise, the stigma around it persists. “When I started writing about my own experience of being childless a decade ago, I broke a huge taboo,” Day says. “It wasn’t something people openly talked about, but the millennial generation is more shame-resilient and willing to share.” Day is a psychotherapist and explains how the grief of not being able to have a child is often misunderstood. “There is still a belief that you can only grieve what you have had, and with childlessness you didn’t lose anything. But I’m afraid you did and it needs attention.”

There can also be a cultural element to the stigma. Rahul (not his real name) is a 40-year-old first-generation immigrant to the UK and supports his remaining family in India. He and his wife live in Manchester and have a seven-year-old daughter, but two years ago they decided they could not afford to have another child. “My wife was very disappointed, as she wanted two children at least,” he says. “It created quite a lot of tension between us, as I was the one labouring the practicalities, but once we sat down to go through the amount it would take to pay for childcare if she continued to work, on top of sending money back and then paying for extra tutoring and afterschool clubs, we realised we wouldn’t be able to give our new child the same quality of life our daughter already has.”

Their wider family was disappointed. “With us being the first here in the UK, my family really expected us to set down roots and to have a sibling for our daughter, otherwise they worried she would be lonely,” Rahul says. “But I hope we’ve made them understand our reasons why.”

‘Britain feels like the worst place you could possibly be in Europe when it comes to raising small children.’
‘Britain feels like the worst place you could possibly be in Europe when it comes to raising small children.’ Illustration: Martina Paukova at MP Arts/The Guardian

“Culturally, you’re part of a collective as a person of colour and everything you do is adding to that collective,” says Yvonne John, a workshop facilitator at Gateway Women. “Being from a West Indian background myself, I have experienced how it can feel like you don’t have a place in that community, because you’re not extending it or bringing something back when you’re childless. So you start to ask: where’s your value? What’s the point of you? We become forgotten and silenced.”

According to the Child Poverty Action Group, the cost of raising a child to 18 in 2021 could be as much as £71,611. Academic Joanna Zajac has a three-year-old daughter and would like another child, but has realised that it is not financially viable, mainly because of childcare costs. “I am Polish and my partner is Italian and in both of these countries you have heavily subsidised childcare, whereas the UK is lagging seriously behind,” she says. “We both work, so we’re already paying the equivalent of another mortgage for our existing childcare. Britain feels like the worst place you could possibly be in Europe when it comes to raising small children.” In a recent survey of more than 20,000 working parents, 97% of respondents said the cost of childcare was too expensive.

The situation has become so dire that Zajac is taking up a better-paid academic post abroad to see if she can earn enough to afford a second child. “Our family will have to separate for a number of months or years and, at 37, I’m also getting older, so things still might not work out because of my biology,” she says. “It is hard not to feel like we have missed our chance.”

For scientific researcher Sarah Hague, 27, even being at the younger end of the millennial generation means feeling a financial burden that is weighing on her decision to have children. “It feels dishonest to say that we won’t have kids – it’s that we can’t because me and my partner both have huge student loans after completing PhDs and it’s a battle between choosing housing or a family,” she says. In Cambridge, where she lives, family homes begin at £400,000 and Hague cannot rely on parental help to buy. Nor can she move elsewhere, since the majority of labs are based either in the city or in the equally expensive Oxford. She has decided to save up for a home, rather than childcare. “You can’t have a family without a stable home and since no-fault evictions are only a two-month notice period now, rental isn’t an option. We could be made homeless in eight weeks,” she says.

Iona Bain, a financial expert, says Britain’s housing shortage needs to be tackled through “land-value reform, encouraging downsizing among older homeowners and the reacquisition of social housing lost to the private sector as part of right to buy. Only then will it have a knock-on effect on birthrates.”

But it is not only housing that causes precariousness. Fiona, a 29-year-old admin assistant, is living in a house-share with seven others. She has two part-time jobs to supplement her £22,000 salary and cannot see a route to financial stability that would enable her to have a family. “I can’t even afford a dog, so how would I afford a child?” she says. “There’s a huge wealth disparity in the UK and it means you have no space to breathe if things go wrong.

Cleary is coming to terms with her and her wife’s decision to indefinitely postpone having children. “We know that if we eventually have a family, it won’t be a ‘neat’ unit,” she says. “Perhaps we might adopt a child who isn’t at a young age, or we might foster, but either way we can only start the process when we are ready and able to give the child the best life we possibly can. If that’s not meant to be, then so be it.”

For Fiona, coming to terms with being childless has ultimately been liberating. “I’ve made peace with it. Although it is a decision that has been taken from me, at least now the focus is on making my life the best it can be for myself,” she says. “We had no choice in being brought into the world, but at least I can take better ownership of my life now, by living it fully.”

Tuesday, 12 October 2021

Time millionaires: meet the people pursuing the pleasure of leisure


‘I just want to do what I’m doing for now. Live a lot more presently.’

It is often a struggle just to stay afloat. But if you had enough money, would you pursue more of it – or should time now be our greatest aspiration?

By  for THE GUARDIAN
Tue 12 Oct 2021 10.00 BST

In every job he has ever had, Gavin has shirked. When he worked in a call centre, he would mute the phone, rather than answer it. When he worked in a pub, he would sneak out of the building and go to another pub nearby, for a pint. His best-ever job was as a civil servant. He would take an hour for breakfast, and two for lunch. No one ever said anything. All his colleagues were at it, too.

One might reasonably describe Gavin (not his real name) as a deadbeat. In economic terms, he is a unit of negative output. In moral terms, he is to be despised; there are antonyms for the word “grafter”, and none of them are good. In religious terms – well, few gods would smile on such indolence. But that is not how Gavin views things. “I work to pay my bills and keep a roof over my head,” he says. “I don’t see any value or purpose in work. Zero. None whatsoever.”

Gavin’s job is an unfortunate expediency that facilitates his enjoyment of the one thing that does matter to him in life: his time. “Life is short,” Gavin tells me. “I want to enjoy the time I have. We are not here for a long time. We are here for a good time.” And for now, Gavin is living the good life. He’s a time millionaire. “I am delighted,” Gavin tells me. “I could not be happier.” He is practically singing.

And his boss? “My boss is happy with the work I’m doing,” he says. “Or more accurately, the work he thinks I’m doing.”

First named by the writer Nilanjana Roy in a 2016 column in the Financial Times, time millionaires measure their worth not in terms of financial capital, but according to the seconds, minutes and hours they claw back from employment for leisure and recreation. “Wealth can bring comfort and security in its wake,” says Roy. “But I wish we were taught to place as high a value on our time as we do on our bank accounts – because how you spend your hours and your days is how you spend your life.”

“We’re seeing this great resignation,” says Charlie Warzel, the author of the Galaxy Brain newsletter and co-author of the forthcoming book Out of Office: The Big Problem and Bigger Promise of Working from Home. “People are quitting their jobs and not returning to work, even if their unemployment benefits are running out.”

The people actively embracing a less work-focused life are, generally speaking, childless members of the professional classes, but Roy argues that this shouldn’t have to be the case. “If society was truly progressive,” she says, “it would not work people to the bone in the first place, or make the assumption that leisure, time to rest, time to be with your family, is only for the wealthy.”

The enforced downtime of the pandemic caused many of us to reassess our attitudes to work, and whether we might be able to lead less lucrative but more fulfilling lives. “I got on a train last week at 7am,” says Samuel Binstead, a 29-year-old coffee shop owner from Sheffield. “And some guys next to me sat down and the first thing they did was get out a laptop and a stack of papers. All I could think was: ‘You are not in the office yet, and you’re already trying to get a head start on work, because it must be the most important thing to you.’ I felt sorry for them.”

When the pandemic hit, the sensation of relief was overwhelming. “It completely changed my relationship with money,” he says. “Having the time at home was so much more valuable to me.” In September 2020, Binstead closed his wine bar and moved his business to a smaller unit. He sells coffee in the morning, and closes for the day at lunchtime. Turnover is down 75%. In the afternoons, Binstead practises photography, or sees friends. He has no career goals. “I just want to do what I’m doing for now,” he says. “Live a lot more presently.” He estimates that he is “100 times happier” than he was before.

He also started from a better place than many would-be time millionaires. As things stand, working less is not an option for minimum-wage workers facing a spiralling cost-of-living crisis, or parents struggling to pay exorbitant childcare costs. “I want to be very clear,” says Isaac Fitzgerald, a New York-based writer. “I am very lucky. I am 38. I don’t have children. I understand what a luxury it is to be able to take three-and-a-half hours out of my day to go for a walk.”

Pre-Covid, Fitzgerald regularly worked 80-hour weeks. “My calendar was meetings upon meetings upon meetings,” he says. “I had this feeling there was never enough time, and that added to my anxiety. That ‘tick tick tick’.” Fitzgerald has now reduced his hours to 30 a week, and his income by 50%. Time is his greatest asset, and one he guards jealously. Time away from his desk is a walk in the Catskill mountains beside waterfalls; it is finding shipwrecks on Long Island beaches. “It’s almost like I am doing my best to protect my time now,” Fitzgerald says. “That comes with being a time millionaire. Just as one would want to protect one’s investment, I protect my time.”

“There’s a movement here that feels pretty organic,” says Warzel“The pandemic was this massive controlled experiment in forcing people to embrace a different way of working. And what we saw was the opposite of what executives had been telling employees for decades: productivity and profits [rose]. Now, people are wondering what else employers were wrong about. What other ways of working have gotten out of sync?”

‘Just as one would want to protect one’s investment, I protect my time.’
‘Just as one would want to protect one’s investment, I protect my time.’ Illustration: Mark Long/The Guardian

The UK workforce is stressed out, overworked and underpaid. British people work the longest hours in Europe, the equivalent of an extra two-and-a-half weeks of unpaid overtime a year. Wages have not kept up with inflation, meaning that in real terms, earnings are lower than before the 2008 financial crisis. “Isn’t it time to question a system of productivity that pushes so many people into jobs and industries that are unsafe, that pay low wages for long hours of work?” asks Roy.

It was not always this way. In pre-industrial Britain, the wealthy elite were defined by their ability to not work, but live off land rents and capital investments. With the advent of industrialisation, and the emergence of an upwardly mobile middle class, industry replaced leisure as a marker of respectability.

The contemporary iteration of this values system emanates from Silicon Valley. Elon Musk is known to work 120-hour weeks, scheduled into five-minute meetings. In her autobiography Lean In, Sheryl Sandberg writes about answering emails from her hospital room, the day after giving birth. “Silicon Valley is a place filled with workaholics,” says Alex Pang, the author of Shorter: How Working Less Will Revolutionise the Way You Get Things Done. “The default is to talk about how many hours you are working. Managers count how many cars are parked in the parking lot on Sunday nights.” Not content with exporting its brutalising work culture, Silicon Valley has also innovated devices to tether us to our offices. “The fact that we carry our offices around in our pockets has made being always ‘on’ a moral imperative,” says Pang.

As a result, leisure has become a dirty word. Any time we scrounge away from work is to be filled with efficient blasts of high-intensity exercise, or other improving activities, such as meditation or prepping nutritionally balanced meals. Our hobbies are monetised side hustles; our homes informal hotels; our cars are repurposed for ride-sharing apps. We holiday with the solemn purpose of returning recharged, ready for ever-more punishing overwork. Doing nothing – simply savouring the miracle of our existence in this world – is a luxury afforded only to the respectably retired, or children.

“In a situation where every waking moment has become the time in which we make our living,” writes Jenny Odell in her anti-productivity tract How to Do Nothing, “and when we submit even our leisure for numerical evaluation via likes on Facebook … time becomes an economic resource that we can no longer justify spending on ‘nothing’. It provides no return on investment; it is simply too expensive.” Odell exhorts readers to recognise that “the present time and place, and the people who are here with us, are … enough”.

The calls to end the fetishisation of overwork, and its concomitant self-optimisation culture, are gaining traction: both the UK and US have prominent campaigns for a four-day week. Futurists such as Pang advocate a world in which technology is not a straitjacket but a force for liberation, enabling “us to be more productive in ways that allow us to reclaim more of our time”. Pang quotes approvingly from Bertrand Russell’s 1932 essay In Praise of Idleness. “Modern methods of production have given us the possibility of ease and security for all [but] we have continued to be as energetic as we were before there were machines,” Russell wrote. “In this we have been foolish, but there is no reason to go on being foolish for ever.”

Until that changes, a more radical approach to our fetid working culture might be to unstick time entirely from notions of capitalist value. “I like the underlying concept of being a time millionaire,” says Pang. “But I’m not sure I like the name. It sounds economical and transactional. What I do like is the idea of placing a greater value on time, and recognising its scarcity, and importance.” After all, we cannot accrue time, or invest it and watch it grow. It runs away from us; we slip and slide in its wake. Perhaps time isn’t a bank account, but a field. We can grow productive crops, or things of beauty; roses for the pruning and topiary hedges to be trimmed. Or we can simply do nothing, and let the wildflowers grow. Everything is of beauty, everything is of equal value.

Apple may cut iPhone 13 production by millions as US warns of Christmas shortages

Shares in Apple fall as global chip shortage and supply chain issues prompt White House to admit there could be empty shelves during festive season Apple may slash the number of iPhone 13s it will make this year by up to 10m because of a shortage of computer chips amid a worldwide supply chain crunch that led the White House to warn that “there will be things that people can’t get” at Christmas. Apple was expected to produce 90m units of the new iPhone models this year but has told its manufacturers that the number would be lower because chip suppliers including Broadcom and Texas Instruments were struggling to deliver components, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday. Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/S9QTHJ

Dutch royals can marry person of same gender without giving up throne, says PM

The prime minister was responding to book arguing old laws would prevent same-sex marriage for a monarch or their heirs A Dutch monarch can marry a person of whatever gender they choose without forfeiting their right to the throne, prime minister Mark Rutte has said. Rutte was responding to questions from parliament that arose from a recent book, Amalia, Duty Calls, which argued that old laws would appear to exclude the possibility of a same-sex couple on the throne, despite same-sex marriage being legal in the Netherlands since 2001. Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/S9QTDR

House passes bill to raise US debt ceiling through early December

* Legislation raises government’s borrowing limit to $28.9tn * Hard-fought House vote passes entirely along party lines The US House of Representatives gave final approval on Tuesday to a Senate-passed bill temporarily raising the government’s borrowing limit to $28.9tn, putting off the risk of default at least until early December. Democrats, who narrowly control the House, maintained party discipline to pass the hard-fought, $480bn debt limit increase. The vote was along party lines, with every yes from Democrats and every no from Republicans. Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/S9QT81

Men in tights: World Rugby law change allows male players to wear leggings

* Previously only women permitted to wear leggings during games * Amendment implemented on ‘welfare and accessibility grounds’ Skinned knees could soon be a thing of the past in rugby union after the sport’s governing body amended its laws to allow players at all levels to wear tights or leggings during games. Law Four of the sport, which covers players’ clothing, previously only permitted women to wear “cotton blend tights or leggings, with single inside seam under their shorts and socks”, but has now been extended to all participants with immediate effect, World Rugby said. Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/S9QT3f

‘It was my playground’: growing up in the shadow of Stonehenge

Daughter of 1930s Stonehenge custodian shares memories as part of English Heritage project She recalls the skylarks soaring overhead and the dog violets in the woods, as well as her father’s battles with moles and his all-night shifts when the druids arrived for midsummer celebrations. Most of all Jean Grey, whose father, John Moffatt, was the custodian at Stonehenge in the 1930s, remembers the fun of the great stone circle being her extraordinary childhood playground. Continue reading...
http://dlvr.it/S9QSzf

Saturday, 9 October 2021

SOCIAL Q’S: My Ex and I Are Friends. Why Won’t His Wife Accept That?

A reader feels hurt by her former partner, who has distanced himself from her now that he’s in a new relationship.

The Supreme Court v. Reality



Credit...Christopher Lee for The New York Times
Opinion Columnist , THE NEW YORK TIMES

WASHINGTON — Ordinarily staid and silent Supreme Court justices have become whirling dervishes of late, spinning madly to rebut the idea that Americans are beginning to regard the court as a dangerous cabal of partisan hacks.

They need not fret and wring their hands. No one is beginning to think that.

Many of us have thought that for a long time.

Supremes are often Shakespeare fans, so of course they are familiar with the phrase “doth protest too much, methinks.”

The once august court’s approval ratings on fairness were already falling two decades ago. The bloom came off the robe in 2000, when the court threw the game on Bush v. Gore, voting 5 to 4 to stop the Florida recount and anoint a Republican president.

If we conjure an alternative-history look at America, consider all the things that the Supreme Court brought down on our heads by pre-emptively purloining that victory for George W. Bush: two interminable and inexplicable wars, costing so many lives and so many trillions; a descent into torture; the villainous Dick Cheney.

As some on Twitter noted, our 20 years of quicksand in Afghanistan was capped Friday with this headline: “Son of Afghanistan’s Former Defense Minister Buys $20.9 Million Beverly Hills Mansion.”

Al Gore, mocked as “Ozone Man” by Bush senior, certainly would have tried to head off the biblical floods and fires engulfing our country.

The right-wing justices may as well embrace their reputation for hackery. Because in this blockbuster year, when the conservative court begins debating abortion and the Second Amendment, one thing is certain: They are going to make rulings that will drive people crazy, rulings that will be out of sync with what most Americans believe.

So please, conservative cabal, don’t pretend you’re not doing this out of ideology.

And please, Justice Breyer, skedaddle. You’re playing a dangerous game. You need to get out of there because it looks as if the midterms are going to be bad, and if the Democrats lose the Senate majority, there’s no guarantee that Mitch McConnell will let any Biden nominee onto the court, even with two years left on the president’s term. Do you want the court to be 7 to 2?

Listen to those Democrats who are warning that staying would be irresponsible and egotistical. Don’t make the colossal mistake that Ruth Bader Ginsburg did, ignoring entreaties from top Democrats and hints from the Obama White House to leave in a timely way and hanging on so long that the worst possible outcome happened: That remarkable feminist’s seat went to the ferociously anti-abortion Lady Handmaid’s Tale, who is trying to cancel out R.B.G.’s legacy.

And please, America, can we have term limits? Justices should not be on the court for 30 years, or into their late 80s.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who did not want the court to be seen as too extreme, has lost control because there are five more rabid conservatives running over him.

Donald Trump’s ability to get three conservatives on the court, thanks to McConnell, will turn out to be the most consequential part of his miserable presidency. And the minority leader is about to get his reward in the form of a bunch of conservative rulings.

The beauty of it for McConnell is that the court is going to do his dirty work for him. Republicans don’t want to vote to roll back abortion rights because they know it’s not popular and they don’t want their fingerprints on it. They’d prefer the court do it.

Linda Greenhouse, who has a book coming out called “Justice on the Brink,” had a piece in The Times summing up why it is brutal for our democracy to have institutions so out of step with majority views in the country: “Three polls within the past month show that fewer than a third of Americans want to see the court overturn Roe v. Wade. Yet it appears that only a third of the justices can be counted on to preserve the right to abortion as defined by the court’s current precedents.” So unlucky women in red states are going back to back-alley days?

As The Times’s Adam Liptak said on “The Daily,” the Supreme Court might tinker with Roe v. Wade, or it might take “an option that will be attractive to the most conservative members of the court,” the one “that gives rise to the headline ‘Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade,’ which would be a big news day.” He also noted that the reason justices are so sensitive now is that “the authority of the Supreme Court — it’s a little hard to know where it comes from. Sure, it’s in the Constitution, but they don’t have an army, they don’t have the power of the purse. It’s not entirely clear why we do what the Supreme Court tells us to do.”

Ignore the charade of the parade of justices protesting that they are pure and neutral. Nobody’s buying it. We all know it’s a disaster if the country’s going one way and the court’s going the other.

The Least Dangerous Branch, as the court was once known, has become the Most Dangerous Branch.

WHAT IS BREAKOUT → RE-TEST?

Breakout: When the price breaks a support or resistance level that it has tested before and moves above or below that level. Re-...